To Tlezer: Are you suggesting that because it is difficult, if not impossible, for you or other investors to interfere with, control, criticize, confront, challenge or micromanage the engineers, technicians and inventors at IDCC, and because it is so much easier, possible and acceptable to do all this with Management, it is therefore the correct and appropriate thing to do, even if you also believe the performance of management has little if any relevance in making your investment decisions?
All I am asking is this: why get yourself and others so worked up about "management issues", if you consider management performance irrelevant or non-essential to your investment decision of buying or selling a stock? Is shareholder activism towards Management just a recreational or sporting activity divorced from the more serious business of making investment decisions?