News Focus
News Focus
icon url

tlezer

05/27/03 10:27 PM

#28737 RE: sophist #28730

Sophist, I don't consider management irrelevant or non-essential. I also don't think it is more important w.r.t. DD than engineering. I'm invested because of the technology. I think a large factor in determining whether my investment will meet my objectives, and which happens to be an area that shareholders have limited ability to control, is dilution, and indirectly PPS.

I would not vote NO if I believe this would hamper IDCC's ability to reward engineers, or produce more valuable patents. I also don't expect management to force through deals just to make shareholders happy. I expect it will take time, and I have a long term investment horizon. Because of that, I don't think it is wise to grant options to a significant percentage of company in the interim. Early on, it was necessary, later on, when the results are tallied, it may be rewarded to players who earned it, but I don't see it being valuable now.
icon url

bulldzr

05/28/03 12:03 AM

#28756 RE: sophist #28730

With all do respect...The subtle and not so subtle personal criticism and baiting of other posters here seems to be primarily coming from the "yes" side, not the "no's". Just my observation. (Not counting Johnse of course, he is a non issue IMO)