Replies to post #11981 on Intl BioChemical Industries Inc fka IBCL

[LostMyDonkey]

Where have you been?

He just took ownership through Nova.

Along with the customers.

I'll also through out another,,, we have no Idea how many liscences where sold while Nova was private.

Back of my mind sits the Government..

I'm not the most intelegent person in the financial world, but If Nova was private just for a few months, I think I could weave a web of steady liscensing income that was not tracable.

Specialy with these shareholders.

How do you trace a liscence? Only if the other party tells you.

Amazing how many Bioshield look alikes are out there only slightly affiliated.

And some just claim proprietory ingredients.

Think about this one...

Where the heck did the trust fund come from in the first place? The mans divorced and running a loosing company.

Mysteriously, he has at least 400,000.00 in trust.

Doesnt sound like the broke feller who has to sell shares to eat.

[utoh]

Dakota, you have a slight math problem with your view.

One of your shares is, in the long run, only equal to 1/10 of one of TM's shares. Remember, he already owns a controlling interest in Nova AND a controlling interest in IBCI. His stockholder position (in HNWS/Nova) will INCREASE with the 1 for 10 reverse; all other stockholder positions will effectively DECREASE by 90%.

This is the major reason folk are finding it so hard to shake loose any substantial shares of HNWS. Ole King Cole controls 87% of the blackbirds in da pie.

I'm just waiting for the announcement that newly restored Nova, residing on the NASDAQ, intends to swallow IBCI in a cents-on-the-dollar stock purchase. We are helpless, mostly due to the 70% of IBCI owned by TM and Hicks (TM alone can carry the stockholder approval vote with his shares and family proxies).

Expect Nova to be in the $4 range at that time; IBCL still in the .02 range. That works out to approximately a 200 for 1 swap.

Kinda makes ya feel like a flea clinging to a horse's rump...