Regarding the MSJ/BGL Court activity over Cinco ... don't know if the below info has been previously discussed or hashed out on this board. Thought I'd just drop it and run, and a s such, any responses/comments made to me about the content will go unanswered.
There continues to be a boringly repetitive argument on the IH board about whether there continues to be a legal battle between them.
For those who are interested let me provide you with the online record from the Mexican judiciary.
One key to finding this is knowing the case number. It is 2378/2012.
You need to do 2 google searches. They are:
2378/2012 "bandera gold"
and
2378/2012 "Minera San Jorge S.A. de C.V."
Both searches will take you to links to www.buholegal.com/
The first one will provide links to 2 docket entries where Bandera is the Complainant. The latest date is 2/27/13
The second search will provide you a list of 14 docket entries, the latest date being 10/23/13, where MSJ is the Complainant.
Both lists pertain to the same case as you can see by the common CASE NUMBER.
The difference in the lists is due to the fact that both sides are not listed at once - only the Complainant - which ping-pongs back and forth.
Use the google translation but it's still hard to understand.
The point is that the matter does still appear to be in process.
No matter what the status is exactly you should have no illusion that it will ever revive the dead scam of Southridge. And nothing I say is in any way an endorsement of Bandera.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
