InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 71
Posts 3731
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/11/2011

Re: quikfix post# 71090

Friday, 11/30/2012 11:42:26 AM

Friday, November 30, 2012 11:42:26 AM

Post# of 167964
So SRGE puts out a PR on November 8 claiming financials will be reported on the 23rd. But if you believe this:

http://www.pumpsanddumps.com/2012/11/pump-dump-incubator-carrillo-huettel.html

Their lawyers had already fled the country by the time the PR by SRGE was being drafted. And so, When on November 23 the Company reported that they had hired new council and would be delayed a week it is most likely based on the fact that on the 23rd the company only found out they were not about to receive a rubber stamp letter.

But here we are a full week later and the financial promised are not here. Why say they would be only a week earlier if you can’t meet your promise? The fact that the PR did not identify the name of the new firm is most likely because that firm did not exist as of last Friday. After all, if you expect to make a financial filing with their name on it only a week later, what is the issue with naming them in your PR the same way you named Magna in the follow on PR?

The world around SRGE is crashing down on them as lie after lie is catching up with them. Is it coincidence that SRGE files for the first time in a long time in October and Carillo Huettel ( a known P&D firm) suddenly run into legal problems that force them to flee? I know I immediately submitted that filing to the SEC and questioned it’s validity. I suspect others did as well.

Can’t wait for the next financial disclosure and the name on the attorney memo. If it is another boiler shop firm with no pedigree in corporate negotiations of the liking that SRGE claims they have you will once again have a dart pointed directly at the bulls eye of fraud.