News Focus
News Focus
Followers 18
Posts 2104
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/20/2008

Re: rbairos post# 8781

Tuesday, 10/18/2011 3:07:26 PM

Tuesday, October 18, 2011 3:07:26 PM

Post# of 46107
Rob, I have learned from your replys in the past. I appreciate you posting thoughts/concerns. There might actually be someone here on occasion who can answer with the authority of first hand knowledge which is what makes this forum of any value at all, but usually that is not me. I was not at the meeting, so I don’t know whether they said that laminar flow was a problem…only that it was a requirement. In my opinion, the liquid flow would not need to be particularly fast, and it certainly does not have to be as viscous as water if the only purpose for going to a liquid is to control heat. Also, the amount of time the two laser beams will intersect in order to illuminate any single voxel will be miniscule. With a low flow requirement, and short (short is too long a word) periods of time required for a voxel to become excited by the lasers and decay back to its original state it just does not seem to me this is anything like ‘drawing in the river’. And remember this a prototype, will a commercial version differ? Probably.

Cool vid from youtube on laminar flow;

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CRTG News