thanks awk, however, scrolling through the myriad presentations, each for which the presenter's professional qualifications are summarized, we clearly see that SKS has a comparatively weak technical and/or scientific training (in contrast to his "colleagues") ... sure, SKS has a mechanical engineering degree from somewhere (which was not referenced, incidentally), AND he's been championing the Trusted Computing cause forever ... HOWEVER, i assert it is abundantly clear to SKS's "colleagues", who have a proven track record (as evidenced in their industry recognized experience and contributions), that SKS is but a bit-player in terms of professional accomplishments...
please see SKS's professional qualifications in contrast to those of other spreakers on inter-related topics -- SKS's professional life includes: (1) working at daddy's company; (2) advancing -- albeit, very effectively -- daddy's dream; (3) stepping into daddy's shoes, when PJS lost steam, understandably, with age; (4) securing a lucrative post for daddy's other son, Michael, in wavexpress; and, (5) providing lucrative salaries for executives who have yet been unable to justify such salaries ...
that said, though WAVX appears poised to turn the corner (lest we forget countless past false alarms), i merely suggest that any WAVX shareholder should recognize that the level of respect and/or admiration afforded SKS from his "colleagues" is questionable at best.
relevance?... WAVX success is guaranteed only by virtue of it's patents -- incl. those on which SKS's name appears, albeit, only when TCG's RAND licensing policy sets for respective valuation #s for IP componants, will we know the relative worth of SKS's patents -- NOT the stellar performance and associated industry praise for its management.
Posted by: awk In reply to: None Date:5/31/2005 9:32:24 PM
Trusted Computing: How to Make Your Systems and Data Truly Secure - GOVSEC 2005 (Washington D.C.)