A.I.M. Users Bulletin Board

[aptus]

"Those using X_DEV can get over 100%/yr with far less risk than any flavor of classic AIM."

Now that's a bold claim. How do you calculate the risk as compared to standard AIM? I've found AIM to be one of the best methods of minimizing risk (along with diversification), so I'd be interested in knowing how your claim of "far less risk" was determined. Do you have historical backtests to show this? Or other data?

Also, when you say you "can get over 100% per year" is that in the general case, or in a specific case? Is it a consistent 100% per year or a one time thing?

My feeling is that if any system can return over 100% per year with LESS RISK than classic AIM, then that's some system indeed. However I also feel such claims should be backed up with hard data.

Regards,
Mark

http://www.automaticinvestor.com