News Focus
News Focus
Followers 210
Posts 32723
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2009

Re: XenaLives post# 31224

Monday, 02/21/2011 11:14:30 AM

Monday, February 21, 2011 11:14:30 AM

Post# of 35802
Because YOU chose to emphasize the phrase that is the basis for my question. So I responded to YOUR post. That is why I asked you instead of "them".

As suggested, I will ask "them":
Will the party that changed the information in the Ibox, including the addition of the words "of which 19.8 million is being closely held by mgt. Note: float was increased by restricted shares coming off restriction in the 4th quarter of 2010" please address the following issues and answer the following questions:

The heading of the data provided clearly shows "(per Transfer Agent)", yet "Don" posted updated share structure information earlier......effective the same date.....quoting the specific wording of the email sent to him by the Transfer Agent. It did not include the phrase that Paula chose to emphasize. I don't believe that the Transfer Agent is in a position to determine how many shares are "being closely held by mgt."
Was that information provided by the Transfer Agent, as indicated, was it provided by company personnel, was it provided by their IR representative or none of the above?
Did whoever provided that information also indicate the identity of the holder(s) and number of shares that came off restriction?
The number of restricted shares actually went UP (from 44mm+ to 47mm+) since the previous Ibox reported numbers. So, if some shares came off restriction, an even larger number of restricted shares were ISSUED. Were the recipient(s) and number of the new restricted shares identified?

If the information was provided by the company or its representatives, were they asked when the more official and widely recognized source of that data, OTCMarkets.com, might be updated?
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GRNO/company-info



Thanks in advance.



Whatever it is, I'm against it............Groucho