InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252803
Next 10
Followers 89
Posts 17612
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

Re: DewDiligence post# 114339

Tuesday, 02/08/2011 10:18:36 PM

Tuesday, February 08, 2011 10:18:36 PM

Post# of 252803
Re: Handicapping the Copaxone Patent Case

I disagree with the architecture of your analysis here.

I think the 2 CoM patents need to be separated from the rest.

For the process patents, your non-infringement point seams valid, but even stronger. I would guess all of these fall with high odds. Though I thought so before, so not a big difference.

The CoM patents do not change. These would only be non-infringing if the MW of mC was higher than the patent, but does that pass the FDA? But these do have a higher odds of being tossed for indefiniteness or ruled unenforcible for inequitable conduct.

My main point is the analysis really needs to be broken out by the 2 sets of patents.



Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.