InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252360
Next 10
Followers 833
Posts 119916
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: DewDiligence post# 114337

Tuesday, 02/08/2011 7:29:41 PM

Tuesday, February 08, 2011 7:29:41 PM

Post# of 252360
Handicapping the Copaxone Patent Case

Based on the issuance of MNTA’s new patent, I’m updating my probability
that NVS/MNTA prevails in the Copaxone litigation on the non-infringement
argument from 30% to 55%. (I’m keeping the probabilities for prevailing on
each of the other three arguments unchanged because those arguments do
not depend in any way on MNTA’s technology.)


OLD probability NEW probability
NVS/MNTA prevails NVS/MNTA prevails
Argument on this argument on this argument


Obviousness/
double patenting 40% 40%

Non-infringement 30% 55%


Indefiniteness 10% 10%

Inequitable conduct 5% 5%
=================== === ===

Composite of
four arguments* 64% 77%



*Calculated by multiplying the probabilities
of each argument’s failing and subtracting
that product from 100%.

JMHO, FWIW

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.