InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 458
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/06/2004

Re: MasterBlaster2u post# 149262

Friday, 03/18/2005 2:00:49 PM

Friday, March 18, 2005 2:00:49 PM

Post# of 358482
MasterBlaster...is the game MasterBlaster or BlasterMaster...anyway, I loved that game!!!

Okay, I just have something to ask here concerning this "criminal" penny stock market. Sure, there's some shady MM stuff that goes on and there's some shady company stuff that goes on. Everyone here is shady, not one or the other. Innocent companies are not being squashed by evil MM's, there's no good and bad guy here.

Simply put, why would ANY legitimate company EVER go to the PINKS? Why? If they were a legitimate company with revenue coming in, why would they sell their shares for .0001? How can you tell me that pink sheet companies are being ruined by MM's when these supposedly rich companies are selling billions of their shares for .0001 and keeping all information from the shareholders?

If CMKX was worth anything, why would it be at .0001? Why would it be on the pinks? Why would it be keeping secrets from shareholders? Most importantly, if CMKX was worth anything, why would it issue 703 BILLION shares!!!!? Can ANYONE answer that question?

Think about it for a moment, why would a company with "staggering valuation" chose this kind of path? Subject themselves to this market? Issue a rediculous number of shares? A company with staggering valuation would simply open on a legit exchange with a legit IPO with a normal OS. The fact that CMKX is where it is should be a red flag to anyone that perhaps we've been more than a little off on how much it's worth, and how legit the CEO is. Can you give me any reason to think otherwise?

Also, I'd be interested in hearing about why a company would open on the Pinks or OTCBB at all. Has there ever been a company who pulled themselves out of the OTCBB? How about a company who pulled themselves out of the Pinks? If there are examples out there, then that's solid evidence that the MMs aren't just destroying companies, and aren't as corrupt as you say. It's also evidence that a company who doesn't make it out of the pits of sh*ts has played a huge part in destroying themselves. How can you account for the success of some and the failure of others if the MMs are corrupt? No, looking at CMKX and the 703 Billion OS, I'd say it was the company's fault. How else do you explain it?




Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.