AI
Thursday, December 09, 2010 12:06:59 AM
Essentially, what you are saying is that they are operating conservatively
Actually from an investment point of view I would hope that MNTA is operating conservatively.
From a due diligence point of view, I am wondering whether MNTA is operating with any of the following guidelines:
- Don't count on the same level of mEnox revenue
- Don't count on an ideal partnership being inked
- Count on tEnox approval
- Count on a drawn out trial re: patent infringement
(not trying to spread FUD, but just illustrating reasons for "operating conservatively" vs. the mode we hope goes well into the future where MNTA prints money from mEnox)
Operating conservatively is fine and is expected of any company, but one should always be looking for events that might affect their investment positively or negatively. I think that's what everybody on this board is trying to do or else why are you here or why invest at all.
And thank you very much for not ripping me to shreds.
Actually from an investment point of view I would hope that MNTA is operating conservatively.
From a due diligence point of view, I am wondering whether MNTA is operating with any of the following guidelines:
- Don't count on the same level of mEnox revenue
- Don't count on an ideal partnership being inked
- Count on tEnox approval
- Count on a drawn out trial re: patent infringement
(not trying to spread FUD, but just illustrating reasons for "operating conservatively" vs. the mode we hope goes well into the future where MNTA prints money from mEnox)
Operating conservatively is fine and is expected of any company, but one should always be looking for events that might affect their investment positively or negatively. I think that's what everybody on this board is trying to do or else why are you here or why invest at all.
And thank you very much for not ripping me to shreds.
Trade Smarter with Thousands
Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.
