[OT]—Thanks for mentioning the book; I’ll check it out.
MON has been a badly managed company, IMO, but it's the best play I know of on the ag component of The Global Demographic Tailwind. So I try to ignore the small stuff and focus on the landscape 5-10 years out. Unless the company screws up far worse than it ever has, I can't see why MON shouldn’t be a $100B company in due course. Regards, Dew
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”