News Focus
News Focus
Followers 6
Posts 970
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2006

Re: Lawrence 147 post# 242504

Monday, 10/18/2010 1:41:02 PM

Monday, October 18, 2010 1:41:02 PM

Post# of 749756
Lawrence147-- Another insightful post. Virtually every post offering any insight today has dealt with DS vs. POR or allowing it to proceed vs. confirmation. I am not much of a legal eagle, but I am still having a very hard time time getting beyond one critical issue:

The whole purpose of this BK case is to maximize returns to the estate in order to pay off debt and come out of BK if possible. It is now months after THJMW questioned if this was Rosen's true intent. Yet hear we are with the DS now approved and being worded in preparation for a confirmation hearing. There are those that say THJMW is just giving Rosen a thicker rope to hang himself. I can't agree or disagree with that because I can't get past the fact that every time Rosen shows up in court, THJMW isn't asking him if he found all the assets yet to move this thing along. If he says yes, then she should say "let's see them and make sure they agree with examiner's findings." If he says no, then she should say "Don't come back into my courtroom without them"

Someone please explain to me why my logic is flawed.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today