InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251720
Next 10
Followers 826
Posts 119569
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: Marvelmeister2002 post# 103349

Thursday, 09/02/2010 5:47:33 PM

Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:47:33 PM

Post# of 251720
Valuation of MNTA’s non-Lovenox assets:

I'm trying to assess whether MTNA is cheap here even assuming every possible negative (with TEVA getting [Lovenox] approval being a big one). I suspect that it is, but would appreciate input on that.

I’ve posted extensively on the various Lovenox scenarios, so I won’t repeat that discussion here. For the non-Lovenox components of MNTA’s business, I try to place a value on each of a set of hypothetical companies that owned one component of MNTA’s asset estate and nothing else. For modeling purposes, I use the following numbers:



Estimated
Asset Value ($ Mln)

Worldwide rights to M118 150

50% of NVS-MNTA
Copaxone collaboration 250

Worldwide rights to M402 50

Worldwide rights to MNTA’s
proprietary technology for
all applications other than
Lovenox/Copaxone/M118/M402 600

Net cash 70

*NOL’s 0*
=========================== =====
All non-Lovenox assets 1,120

*I ascribe no separate value to the NOL’s because I consider them integral to MNTA’s Lovenox asset.

JMHO, FWIW

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.