Here's what I believe. Mark it for future reference if you want. This is my own humble opinion based on my own due diligence. If I'm wrong, I'll freely admit it and toast those who were right. But, I don't think I am. I believe the story goes like this:
Clark and Estrella came in because they saw an opportunity that they deemed to be a potential for success. They've worked hand in hand for many years and they know how to work together to create winning corporate outcomes - plain and simple. Timing is everything, of course, and I think they were fortunate in this regard, but coincidentally they also have the experience to see a scenario for its unrealized potential and take it to its realized outcome. Let's not forget, they came in together, not as separate hires. This is meaningful. They are a team with a plan.
So, what were some of the issues that Clark and Estrella had to command?
1) They had to come to a total understanding of the (GlobeTel/Sanswire) players involved, the power structure as is - this includes all legal remedies for potential voting rights obstacles, shares ownership, fund raising via share sales including future warrants and previous questionable deals, if any; AND a wholesale, common sense plan that would convince all cast members that, indeed, this is a company that can be a major player if all agree to fly in formation. Pun intended. This included having a firm grasp on cost and implementation of product development, necessary funding for continuance of product development and a distinct understanding of the specific marketplace for these products. They are experts in the field of mergers and acquisitions. They don't get involved until a clear picture is in front of them. Period. Anyone who posts things like "just another couple of scam artists looking to steal shares" is either short SNSR and bashing or has their head way up their a$$ and shouldn't own a computer with a working keyboard.
2) They had to make the SEC go away. How did they do this? They brought credibility to the company by swaying the argument that Sanswire has a real - not scammed or imagined - going concern through proof of product viability and interested parties. (Those parties are more than likely at this point a direct tie to L3 and their multiple UAV contracts. Later, L3 will not be needed as Sanswire, in its future state of safety from further recrimination from the SEC as well as its future state of profitablility, will do business directly with Uncle Sam as a credible manufacturer for goods, that our military (and other companies) requires, at a desirable price.) SEC fines will have been paid with money they were able to bring to the table and, thus, the settlement is history. The SEC can't be interested in Sanswire's previous iterations to the point of revoction of shares or delisting when such an obvious epiphany is taking place. They want to address the wrongdoers, not the rightdoers. I doubt this case goes to trial. If it does, I believe it will, for all intents and purposes, target corrupt individuals from the past scam that was, for their errant ways, not the present company on the grounds that every best effort is being made to give shareholders a real certificate of value.
3) The next thing that needed to be part of the overall picture is, of course, the end game - the takeover. Now that the internal workings constitute an acceptable corporate structure, legal issues have been addressed and remedied, contracts afford further R&D and we've seen institutional interest of consequence, what's left? Increased share value based on sales and future sales, of course. Proven top line growth with acceptable margins and future contracts that appear consistent and sustainable will provide the desired fatted calf. At this point, Sanswire looks to be a takeover target. This is the end game for all of us and Clark and Estrella have known this all along. The plan is in place. Let's hope it succeeds. I wish the very best of luck to all.
bank
