News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257372
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122856
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: poorgradstudent post# 100665

Wednesday, 08/04/2010 12:55:17 PM

Wednesday, August 04, 2010 12:55:17 PM

Post# of 257372

Not right now, no. In my opinion, it's not meant (or destined) to serve as the sole treatment in an acute setting. But this procedure is actually something I've started to study, and it is surprisingly effective. The effects are systemic (not so much local) and, in my own view, a very useful method to reveal protective pathways.

I think you and dewophile are using the word systemic differently than I am. Yes, leg compression has some beneficial effect all over the body. But would leg compression be considered a valid means of preventing a clot in, say, the coronary arteries following a stent procedure?

I doubt it. Rather, I think the compression device that’s the subject of this thread will be limited to cases where the likely origin of a clot is in the legs, such as following hip- or knee-replacement surgery. And, even then, I don’t see it as a replacement for anticoagulation.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today