SEC >>> 'materially deficient in explanation or clarity.' hrct provides almost no explanation of those massive <<and growing>> loans to 'sale agents' 'secured' by 'building licenses'
EXACTLY what are hrcts options if the sales agents default? - is there full personal recourse against the agents? - how credit worthy are the agents? - how did the agents spend/invest the money? - why arent the agents named? - why are the loans rising when business seems to be falling? - what are building licenses (and why aren't they mentioned in newer filings)? - how valuable and liquid are those licenses? - have the licenses been appraised professionally? - who approved the loans? (that could be big) - if hrct had to go to court how would they now finance the litigation?
read the new sec policies on reviewing public filing every three years at minimum >>>