I have no objection to this interpretation. In Fact I can agree with it. I have been active with the AIM structure for quite a number of years now and I feel that I am beginning to understand the nitty gritty stuff under the skin if it. Also, the discusssions on the AIM Boards have given me quite a bit additional insight into the differences between simple AIMs and complex AIMs.
This makes it also very evident to me that AIM no longer can be used as if it is one thing only. If you go to a car dealer then the thing called Car has no longer the meaning it had when only one model could be bought from a dealer.
That is what I want to make very clear. I think we as AIMers need to present to the readers that AIM is more than the Lichello AIM.
I am developing a means to get an AIM-discussion going in Holland for Dutch readers. This would include a discussion platform and a vehicle to specifically address Vortex AIM features and examples. Naturally this is ultimately geared to sell the program VORTEX.