I see only that people here still continue to ignore, or fail to understand, the nature of the interlocutory decision that is what she has rendered...
Simply is a fact that she has not granted them carte blanche to screw anyone... rather than having postured for them an ABILITY to do it right, while making it clear that NOT doing it right will not pass muster.
"The judge said that any settlement must benefit all unitholders" and then, with plaintiffs, has given the defendants a chance to deliver a process and a result that does just that.
They haven't yet... and now, it seems, there isn't anything left to happen, here... other than waiting to see if defendants follow through with a proper effort, or pull the plug and opt to go to trial.