TooFuzzy.
This board is a chat board now. A lot of traffic. I am going to take rest, but you wrote this and will reply in shorthand:
Maybe with a lot of head scratching you will be able to simplify it so it will be as understandable as E=MC(squared)
I am sure a lot of unintelligible calculations took place before Einstein hit upon that formula!
1) As I have outlined my thoughts on formalizing the AIM mathematics, it amounts to a rather simple set of linear equations that are treated mathematically between the trading points. Between these points the mathematics are simple. This means that the functions can be differentiated or integrated(if that was desirable). I shall make up an example of what I mean.
2) You say that E=MC^2 is understandable. OK, if you simply see it as a quadratic equation I agree. What it means is profound and mysterious, even for the extend that it may not be true exactly. The works leading up to that were not unintelligible at all. The work of Lorentz and Maxwell, and many others, being faulty in some ways, was the cornerstone of this final equation. Einstein brought the bits and pieces together and added his own unique elements. It's a simple representation of what is measured, at least to within the accuracies of what can be measured.
Zzzzzzzz
Conrad
AI
