InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[mickeybritt]

Loophole

Let me ask you a more than dumb question if these committees that you alledge is so concerned about what is fair, first why hasn't these bastards intervened and told Nokia damnit be reasonable. Then answer me how can QCOM get so much more for their patents than IDCC does? Next how can a company beyond a shadow of doubt declare if they own 1 essential patent forget all the rest but 1 they say they would charge 2 1/2% yet when it comes time to pay for your essential patent it is worth nothing. You tell the chairman and the rest of the members of the committee to stick their opinion's and rules where the sun don't shine. I own this crap and if yours is worth X then by God mine is worth X also.

The value of a patent should never be determined by any standards committee but through good and fair negotiations, but when one party want be reasonable then your enforcement as a committee means zip as its a court ruling not a standards ruling.Since you are a versed attorney, and you well know what Nokia's position was on the value of their patent, then why would the value of the IDCC patent be deminished because they had to survive because bastards like Nokia forced IDCC to have to settle for crumbs with others because your big fat azz was acting in such a manner to not pay and force your opposition to have to spend millions trying to get license with other companies because Nokia wouldn't license a reasonable and fair rate. Nokia forced IDCC to have to take settlements that was not even frigging close to fair in order to stay in business. I ask you sir if your client had paid IDCC a reasonable rate, do you really believe these other licensee's would be paying the low rate they received? You see Nokia devalued every patent IDCC had by their actions both in 2G and 3G and they also have a history of trying to screw anyone they can that owns a patent they utilize. Their fighting small companies has put them out of business and they have then had the luxury of getting the use of the patents for nothing, and they also cry frandly after forcing and I repeat forcing the small guy to give deals that would never been accepted but had to accept to keep the doors open and the company survive. No my friend as far as Mickey Britt is concerned Nokia has violated anything remotely close to fairness and done their level best to drive IDCC out of business, and as far as I am concerned IDCC can tell Nokia to you know what and the horse you road in on, lets see what a jury says you should pay.

JMO
Mickey