Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,519.12
(
0.61%
)
US TECH 100
29,372.00
(
0.55%
)
Dow Jones
50,461.68
(
-0.23%
)
Brent Oil
93.76
(
-3.33%
)
Bitcoin
75,866.61
(
0.03%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 359165
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

janice shell

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2583
Posts 329745
Boards Moderated 23
Alias Born 04/12/2001

janice shell

Member Level

Re: Kimberlite post# 60346

Friday, 07/23/2004 12:26:55 AM

Friday, July 23, 2004 12:26:55 AM

Post# of 359165
t seems to me that if there is 400billion OS then it DOES indicate Naked Shorting. Explain to me how it's the other way around? Not being a smarty. Sincere question. I just don't understand the logic.

If CMKX has 400 billion shares out, which I believe it does, then getting a borrow shouldn't be a problem. So why take the risk of shorting naked?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today