DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

Read the report.

And days later, Marianna police detective Carl McCree and Police Chief Vincent Bell stopped a car with suspicious plates. Bell said that in a city of only 5,000, the car triggered "the sixth sense that we sometimes as police officers have."

"The conversation that [the driver] was having with me connected him with the city of Marianna and Little Rock," Bell added. "There was a red flag."

The Marianna police called Little Rock and 15 minutes later detectives were questioning Curtis Vance, who agreed to a DNA sample swabbed from his cheek.

The DNA matched both crimes via standard DNA tests.

No DNAWitness usage scenario at all. No reason to suspect DNAWitness was used.

DNA was collected from the crime scene, and somehow not defined in the press (perhaps through DNAWitness,) the police were able to locate the suspect.

As specifically defined by the press, the police were able to locate the subject. Routine traffic stop. Is it your contention that DNAWitness replaced the suspects license plates in order for him to be apprehended?

Given the pertinent nature of the other point in my post, I am curious why you didn't present a counter response to the 'volume' argument? Very curious.

regards,
frog