Monday, November 03, 2008 1:27:55 PM
So they filed that 1.7 billion was returned and yet there was NO other evidence than their word that actually happend.
Meanwhile the IR firm pumping these PR's out is the same one for another stock being investigated for misinformation in PR's.
It's going to take more than a pinksheet "filing" to convince anyone that it actually happend. How about a court verdict from public records of the proceedings?
Here's an obvious idea! If these 3.7 or 4.whatever billion shares are to be recovered within a month, then why raise the A/S to inject another 4.8 billion shares into the O/S as restricted shares? Just wait to get those shares back and use those for the MONA dividend and to purchase the Australian Atari maker.
Meanwhile the IR firm pumping these PR's out is the same one for another stock being investigated for misinformation in PR's.
It's going to take more than a pinksheet "filing" to convince anyone that it actually happend. How about a court verdict from public records of the proceedings?
Here's an obvious idea! If these 3.7 or 4.whatever billion shares are to be recovered within a month, then why raise the A/S to inject another 4.8 billion shares into the O/S as restricted shares? Just wait to get those shares back and use those for the MONA dividend and to purchase the Australian Atari maker.
These are my opinions unless otherwise noted.
Proud member #2 of the "iHub 9". All CAPS will crush the whimpy girly man quotes!!!
http://www.pinksheets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=15992
Recent TCRI News
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/30/2026 03:14:32 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/05/2025 08:56:34 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/12/2025 02:07:41 PM
