Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,592.77
(
0.15%
)
US TECH 100
23,461.20
(
0.26%
)
Dow Jones
46,531.87
(
0.06%
)
Brent Oil
108.36
(
-0.75%
)
Bitcoin
69,578.00
(
0.83%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 157300
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

justfrank

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 21
Posts 3107
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/02/2003

justfrank

Re: Jetmek_03052 post# 102702

Friday, 05/02/2008 4:03:40 PM

Friday, May 02, 2008 4:03:40 PM

Post# of 157300
Pointed it out to you last night.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=28968785

What the SEC sought

The SEC alleges that Huff violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 and seeks as relief a permanent injunction and a civil penalty.

What they got

Without admitting or denying the charges against him, Huff consented to final judgment permanently enjoining him from future violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act and ordering him to pay a $30,000 civil penalty.

Don't let your prejudices, assumptions and ego cause you to come to conclusions which on the surface seem sound and correct but in reality are flawed

My Board for discussion of any stock.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=8758

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today