Sunday, December 16, 2007 1:55:23 PM
It's not a theory. On the date of the corp counsels release (Dec 5) a meeting, previously, had been scheduled for Dec 22. Propper notification deadlines have passed so the meeting will have to be held on a later date if at all.
Why don't you sue them.
Perhaps you would have rather the release say
"Mr. Frohling stated that the Company might have scheduled a Shareholders meeting for December 22, 2007, details to be announced"
that would be false because the company DID call a meeting.
Why don't you sue them.
Perhaps you would have rather the release say
"Mr. Frohling stated that the Company might have scheduled a Shareholders meeting for December 22, 2007, details to be announced"
that would be false because the company DID call a meeting.
Recent BDGR News
- BDGR Announces Revenue Producing Acquisitions and Management Financial Updates • ACCESS Newswire • 12/31/2025 01:35:00 PM
- Shareholders Updates • ACCESS Newswire • 12/30/2025 01:35:00 PM
- Shareholders Updates • ACCESS Newswire • 12/22/2025 01:41:00 PM
