News Focus
News Focus
Followers 4
Posts 504
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/18/2007

Re: defireman post# 37046

Sunday, 12/09/2007 3:28:34 PM

Sunday, December 09, 2007 3:28:34 PM

Post# of 72325
You stated "Apparently the court of Montreal has deemed that BCS's case has enough merit for it to issue a SECOND injunction on RH and ECT not to engage in promoting and selling SDS/CRAM."

It is another of your baseless statement. ECT's lawyers have stated that ECT can distribute and sell CRAM.

You said you have never seen ECT's CRAM being offered for sale. It is actually not equal to CRAM is not being offered for sale in reality. I here question information gathering ability. Also, at least give us proof that ECT is not selling CRAM before posting baseless statements in this board.

Since you never given proof of anything and keep posting unsubstantiated statements here, can I see you spread rumors and lies to blacken ECT's name provided that I don't have proof?






Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today