Perhaps. But reading through the J973EP's specs and description at Teradyne's web site gives me the impression that this machine is a production tester. Engineering testers don't have quad gang test head capability and their vendors don't talk about switching methodologies on the fly to minimize "test cost".
Also keep in mind AMD's test engineering resources and the volume of A64 devices they produce. Even with a one minute average final test time, running just one eight hour shift a day, five days a week on a single quad head J973 could process half a million devices a year. Go to two shifts a day, 7 days a week and that's over 1.3m devices a year.
What's the NRE cost to design, characterize, and qualify a BIST based HT test procedure on older ATE? How would that compare to simply buying a second and third J973 and so on?