"Our success will be dependent on the personal efforts of Bernard Rubin and Richard Papaleo, our president and CEO respectively"
So Rubin bad Papaleo good?
They both diluted and destroyed this shell into the ground but now these slimy 3rd party cons are prasing one and trashing the other?
Doesn't Papaleo get the same consideration as the guy he ran hand and hand with?
The snakes might have just found a new patsy in Coogan to bleed the rest of the dilution out of this shell?
"The scam left with Rubin" is incredibly inaccurate?
IMO
IMO
Everything I post, is In my own opinion, I don't care what you think about it, if you disagree, post it like I do. If you buy or sell stock based on what I say, your a lunatic and should not be trading. Have a great day!