Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,064.01
(
-0.63%
)
US TECH 100
25,947.60
(
0.68%
)
Dow Jones
49,447.43
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
95.28
(
0.28%
)
Bitcoin
78,263.88
(
2.54%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 157300
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

risk_it_us

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 11
Posts 1757
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/17/2006

risk_it_us

Re: ineedtoknow post# 67336

Friday, 03/09/2007 10:38:55 AM

Friday, March 09, 2007 10:38:55 AM

Post# of 157300
No, I didn't say that. I said "anything substantial". You can bet that the SEC will find something but it may be insignificant as far as the company is concerned. Dig hard enough in any companies books and you'll find a mistake or two or three.... but if the sec finds nothing significant or substantial then the suit is over. That's the strongest support the lawsuit has other than some supporting documents about routing inside sales. This suit depends now on the sec investigation but that's my opinon only with that matter.

btw, I updated my last post. I replaced "plaintiff's" with "defense"

Remember that overlypromotional and hype statements from individuals and companies are illegal. If you feel investors are being "rooked" contact the SEC.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today