Let’s be real, this post reads like someone found a law textbook and decided that quoting SEC Rule 10b-5 makes them an authority. Announcing a buyback on social media is not a violation, and the Q2 report isn’t required to confirm it. Pretending it does is just fear-mongering disguised as insight. The entire “I did basically agree w/ your previous post” line is laughable, vague approval doesn’t suddenly make your take credible. And the way he throws around phrases like “employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud” while offering zero evidence of fraud or misleading statements is just performative, designed to make him feel smart rather than actually inform anyone. He acts like the buyback somehow needs accounting confirmation in Q2 to be real, which is false, and his vague reference to dollar amounts only highlights that he has no actual point. The post is a masterclass in verbosity over substance, overcomplicating a simple social media buyback announcement to make himself look important, while everyone else sees it for what it is: attention-seeking noise with zero actionable insight.
And to the CPA egomaniac waving SEC rules like a baton: save the theatrics. Throwing around legalese doesn’t make up for the fact that your argument has no grounding in reality. This isn’t insight, it’s ego dressed as expertise.
I've put this CPA egomaniac on ignore because, frankly, he’s not worth the bandwidth. His posts are all performance and no substance, all ego and no evidence. Chasing attention through legal theatrics and vague claims doesn’t make him credible; it makes him irrelevant. I engage with facts, not his self-appointed authority, and that’s why I'm done entertaining the act.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
