Saturday, August 02, 2025 2:55:31 PM
Jetmek — The Problem Isn’t Linda, It’s Shorts Running Out of Excuses
Jetmek, you’ve built a whole narrative around what Linda “knows,” yet you’re not in the room with her, not on the board, not even a shareholder who believes in the company. You’re guessing — loudly — and dressing those guesses up as certainty.
Let’s unpack your talking points:
---
1️⃣ “Linda won’t do a preferred dividend because it might go nowhere.”
If the dividend exposes nothing, there’s no harm to the company:
No cost beyond a basic filing and TA work.
No dilution.
No long-term damage to price discovery.
If there are synthetic shorts, the action forces truth to the surface.
In either case, the only group with anything to lose are those sitting short — real or synthetic. So who’s really scared of it happening? It’s not longs.
---
2️⃣ “DBMM only survived because of Lucia and SEC mercy.”
That’s one way to spin it. Another way:
DBMM fought back and won the right to trade freely, proving that revocation was never justified.
That’s not a “handout.” That’s a company defending shareholder rights and winning. Shorts expected a kill shot and didn’t get it — hence their obsession with keeping the price pinned ever since.
---
3️⃣ “Business performance is all that matters.”
This isn’t a debate about revenue. It’s a debate about whether price discovery has been artificially capped for a decade.
A broken market structure can bury any fundamentals. Ask Overstock, ask countless OTC issuers with chronic FTDs. The point of a preferred share dividend isn’t to magically make DBMM profitable overnight — it’s to clear out fake supply and give the market a fair baseline.
---
4️⃣ “Linda knows NSS is fantasy and doesn’t want holders to dump.”
Funny how every “there are no shorts” crusader:
Spends years on a board for a “worthless stock.”
Obsessively attacks any solution that would prove or disprove naked shorting instantly.
If you were truly confident there’s nothing there, you’d be begging Linda to issue the dividend, watch the truth come out, and put this debate to rest forever. But instead, you’re desperate to convince others it’s a “fantasy.”
Because deep down, you know that if the trigger is pulled and synthetic shares are forced to deliver, the game changes forever — and not in your favor.
---
Time will tell, Jetmek. But when the truth finally drops, it won’t take 6 months, a year, or two years for you to feel it.
It’ll take T+3 days.
– Krombacher
Jetmek, you’ve built a whole narrative around what Linda “knows,” yet you’re not in the room with her, not on the board, not even a shareholder who believes in the company. You’re guessing — loudly — and dressing those guesses up as certainty.
Let’s unpack your talking points:
---
1️⃣ “Linda won’t do a preferred dividend because it might go nowhere.”
If the dividend exposes nothing, there’s no harm to the company:
No cost beyond a basic filing and TA work.
No dilution.
No long-term damage to price discovery.
If there are synthetic shorts, the action forces truth to the surface.
In either case, the only group with anything to lose are those sitting short — real or synthetic. So who’s really scared of it happening? It’s not longs.
---
2️⃣ “DBMM only survived because of Lucia and SEC mercy.”
That’s one way to spin it. Another way:
DBMM fought back and won the right to trade freely, proving that revocation was never justified.
That’s not a “handout.” That’s a company defending shareholder rights and winning. Shorts expected a kill shot and didn’t get it — hence their obsession with keeping the price pinned ever since.
---
3️⃣ “Business performance is all that matters.”
This isn’t a debate about revenue. It’s a debate about whether price discovery has been artificially capped for a decade.
A broken market structure can bury any fundamentals. Ask Overstock, ask countless OTC issuers with chronic FTDs. The point of a preferred share dividend isn’t to magically make DBMM profitable overnight — it’s to clear out fake supply and give the market a fair baseline.
---
4️⃣ “Linda knows NSS is fantasy and doesn’t want holders to dump.”
Funny how every “there are no shorts” crusader:
Spends years on a board for a “worthless stock.”
Obsessively attacks any solution that would prove or disprove naked shorting instantly.
If you were truly confident there’s nothing there, you’d be begging Linda to issue the dividend, watch the truth come out, and put this debate to rest forever. But instead, you’re desperate to convince others it’s a “fantasy.”
Because deep down, you know that if the trigger is pulled and synthetic shares are forced to deliver, the game changes forever — and not in your favor.
---
Time will tell, Jetmek. But when the truth finally drops, it won’t take 6 months, a year, or two years for you to feel it.
It’ll take T+3 days.
– Krombacher
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
