Friday, May 30, 2025 11:13:50 AM
Realistically that is 100% correct. But right now the trading is based on the forward worded part of the commentary.
A. The trading right now are on the unknowns of potential.
B. Financing a facility abroad costs $$$$$$. Where is it coming from. Whose pockets? Ours as shareholders in LQMT or LL’s?
C. If this is on the up and up. IMO, you don’t draw a salary from a company that hasn’t accomplished much in years, spend $$$$$$ on a facility unless you have more than spit and a handshake.
D. There are no details yet. LQMT is paying a person with conflicting interests. The facility to be opened in is not in LQMT’s footprint. Appears to be as you stated going up against another company with existing agreements.
E. One can speculate the cash burn increases and LQMT shareholders get screwed again or this time the Asian holding company will be able to transfer back more money than just a BS fee.
F. Right now whoever rolls the dice has to know there are no guarantees especially with the history of this company and that they are gambling, taking a high risk that in the future the $$$$$ earned if any will make the dice roll worth it.
G. Again the dice roll is blindly in the potential and not the possibility of a realistic negative outcome, no matter how many millions the holding company earns and the zero dollars LQMT might receive. Otherwise this is just a scam to siphon cash out of LQMT USA.
This 8K is about the speculation and hype not about the reality. So far it’s disappointing. I thought it would have opened up much higher and realistically the trading volumes are pitiful.
But like I stated in another post all LQMT news has culminated in insignificant success. But it always pops the share price regardless of the outcome.
A. The trading right now are on the unknowns of potential.
B. Financing a facility abroad costs $$$$$$. Where is it coming from. Whose pockets? Ours as shareholders in LQMT or LL’s?
C. If this is on the up and up. IMO, you don’t draw a salary from a company that hasn’t accomplished much in years, spend $$$$$$ on a facility unless you have more than spit and a handshake.
D. There are no details yet. LQMT is paying a person with conflicting interests. The facility to be opened in is not in LQMT’s footprint. Appears to be as you stated going up against another company with existing agreements.
E. One can speculate the cash burn increases and LQMT shareholders get screwed again or this time the Asian holding company will be able to transfer back more money than just a BS fee.
F. Right now whoever rolls the dice has to know there are no guarantees especially with the history of this company and that they are gambling, taking a high risk that in the future the $$$$$ earned if any will make the dice roll worth it.
G. Again the dice roll is blindly in the potential and not the possibility of a realistic negative outcome, no matter how many millions the holding company earns and the zero dollars LQMT might receive. Otherwise this is just a scam to siphon cash out of LQMT USA.
This 8K is about the speculation and hype not about the reality. So far it’s disappointing. I thought it would have opened up much higher and realistically the trading volumes are pitiful.
But like I stated in another post all LQMT news has culminated in insignificant success. But it always pops the share price regardless of the outcome.
Recent LQMT News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/08/2026 08:37:19 PM
- Liquidmetal Technologies Inc. to Present at the LD Micro Main Event XIX • Newsfile • 10/06/2025 11:30:00 AM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/13/2025 08:00:57 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/10/2025 08:02:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/29/2025 08:02:37 PM
