News Focus
News Focus
Followers 53
Posts 17422
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 01/11/2004

Re: sylvia07 post# 362400

Friday, 05/23/2025 5:25:23 PM

Friday, May 23, 2025 5:25:23 PM

Post# of 370006
LOL. Unreal.

Linda is smart enough to know to fight for her valued shareholderes and not let shorts off the hook.



You are quite delusional.

You should REALLY think about that statement.

IF there was the SLIGHTEST chance that a large naked short share position was actually in existence? Then what could POSSIBLY be a reason why Linda would wait to expose it?? If there was such a position, and it was exposed, it would only help her, ALL the shareholders and any "LTI's". EVERYONE would benefit! And it would have the added benefit of destroying all of the hated shorts at the same time!

So, tell the board Sylvia - WHY wouldn't Linda do ALL SHE COULD to expose it - wouldn't she want to do it as SOON AS POSSIBLE?????

There's only two possible reasons WHY she might not want to take any action.

1. She knows for a FACT that the naked short position doesn't exist, and that exposing the fact that it does not exist would destroy the share price of DBMM, as those waiting around for a big squeeze bail and sell.

2. NOW - this is only opinion and I have ZERO PROOF of this. But the OTHER reason might be that she either knows WHO the shorts are and she is protecting them for unknown reasons....or that SHE HERSELF was involved in the shorting of DBMM so long ago. As I said, that is only opinion. I know nothing for certain about that. I am only trying to think of a valid reason why Linda would wait to expose a valid naked short position that she was knew existed.

Frankly, I strongly believe it's #1.

But I'd LOVE to hear YOUR opinion of why Linda doesn't act to expose it, if she suspects in the slightest that there is a large naked short position in existence.

The Lord knows she has had YEARS upon YEARS to take action and expose it!
Bearish
Bearish