Wednesday, February 26, 2025 10:02:28 AM
The Real Issue Isn’t Me—It’s DBMM’s Inaction
Jetmek, you’ve spent an impressive amount of time trying to discredit me, but you’ve completely dodged the main issue: Why hasn’t DBMM taken a simple action that would prove, once and for all, whether naked shorting exists?
You keep saying you want to "see if a short position exists"—then why aren’t you demanding action from DBMM?
Let’s break this down:
1️⃣ Preferred Share Dividend – The One Move That Ends the Debate
You and Stock Barber claim you’d welcome anything that exposes shorts, yet you attack the one proven strategy that would do just that.
DBMM could issue a preferred share dividend just like Overstock did, and the truth would be exposed.
So why aren’t you pushing for DBMM to do it?
---
2️⃣ Your Argument Falls Apart on Market Suppression
You say "there is no evidence of market suppression."
Yet:
The stock rallied strongly after the CE removal, only to be met with immediate capping and selling pressure.
Short volume spikes coincide with upward momentum.
DBMM reported increased liquidity interest, but that liquidity never materialized—a classic sign of a manipulated market.
You demand "proof," but the evidence is in the trading patterns, and you conveniently ignore it.
---
3️⃣ DBMM’s Business Struggles Are Tied to Market Manipulation
You bring up DBMM’s declining revenue, but you fail to consider:
A suppressed stock price limits capital-raising opportunities.
DBMM’s ability to attract new clients is hampered when its stock is artificially devalued.
The company was under an SEC battle for years—a major distraction from growth.
The market impact is real—and pretending DBMM’s struggles are purely business-related is naive at best, intellectually dishonest at worst.
---
4️⃣ The Strawman Argument About Contacting Linda
You love to focus on whether I’ve contacted Linda, but let’s be clear:
This isn’t about me—it’s about why DBMM management isn’t taking action on their own.
You claim to want proof of shorting, yet you won’t push DBMM to act.
If DBMM is so confident there are no shorts, why don’t they prove it?
If DBMM truly believes there’s no shorting, issuing a preferred share dividend would expose the truth. So why won’t they do it?
---
5️⃣ Put Up or Shut Up – But Not to Me, To DBMM
If you really believe what you’re saying, demand action from DBMM.
A preferred share dividend would prove everything.
If DBMM refuses to act, that tells you all you need to know.
The burden isn’t on me—it’s on DBMM management to take action.
The fact that you spend all your energy attacking me instead of pressuring DBMM says it all.
🚀 DBMM can end this debate anytime they want. The fact that they don’t is the real story. 🚀
$DBMM Baby!
Krombacher
Jetmek, you’ve spent an impressive amount of time trying to discredit me, but you’ve completely dodged the main issue: Why hasn’t DBMM taken a simple action that would prove, once and for all, whether naked shorting exists?
You keep saying you want to "see if a short position exists"—then why aren’t you demanding action from DBMM?
Let’s break this down:
1️⃣ Preferred Share Dividend – The One Move That Ends the Debate
You and Stock Barber claim you’d welcome anything that exposes shorts, yet you attack the one proven strategy that would do just that.
DBMM could issue a preferred share dividend just like Overstock did, and the truth would be exposed.
So why aren’t you pushing for DBMM to do it?
---
2️⃣ Your Argument Falls Apart on Market Suppression
You say "there is no evidence of market suppression."
Yet:
The stock rallied strongly after the CE removal, only to be met with immediate capping and selling pressure.
Short volume spikes coincide with upward momentum.
DBMM reported increased liquidity interest, but that liquidity never materialized—a classic sign of a manipulated market.
You demand "proof," but the evidence is in the trading patterns, and you conveniently ignore it.
---
3️⃣ DBMM’s Business Struggles Are Tied to Market Manipulation
You bring up DBMM’s declining revenue, but you fail to consider:
A suppressed stock price limits capital-raising opportunities.
DBMM’s ability to attract new clients is hampered when its stock is artificially devalued.
The company was under an SEC battle for years—a major distraction from growth.
The market impact is real—and pretending DBMM’s struggles are purely business-related is naive at best, intellectually dishonest at worst.
---
4️⃣ The Strawman Argument About Contacting Linda
You love to focus on whether I’ve contacted Linda, but let’s be clear:
This isn’t about me—it’s about why DBMM management isn’t taking action on their own.
You claim to want proof of shorting, yet you won’t push DBMM to act.
If DBMM is so confident there are no shorts, why don’t they prove it?
If DBMM truly believes there’s no shorting, issuing a preferred share dividend would expose the truth. So why won’t they do it?
---
5️⃣ Put Up or Shut Up – But Not to Me, To DBMM
If you really believe what you’re saying, demand action from DBMM.
A preferred share dividend would prove everything.
If DBMM refuses to act, that tells you all you need to know.
The burden isn’t on me—it’s on DBMM management to take action.
The fact that you spend all your energy attacking me instead of pressuring DBMM says it all.
🚀 DBMM can end this debate anytime they want. The fact that they don’t is the real story. 🚀
$DBMM Baby!
Krombacher
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
