InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 89
Posts 17458
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

Re: ilovetech post# 663819

Saturday, 01/13/2024 1:01:52 PM

Saturday, January 13, 2024 1:01:52 PM

Post# of 704163

From a layman's perspective, I found Posner's amended brief to be as thorough as one could hope, and more than sufficient under an honest court to move to discovery.


Sure.

The main issue in play is that NWBO is asserting they sold stock numerous times at prices that based (at least partially) on closes prices of some spoofing date. Problem is the dates NWBO asserts has sales based on closes from a month prior to the sale to several weeks AFTER the sale.

The Court rightfully raised on eyebrow on that. It is not uncommon to have private sales based on previous several days or even a week or so of closes. But a month in the past? And how could it even be possible to base it on the future closes?

NWBO has elected not to try to prove their assertion of the formulistically based sale price, but is simply saying they assert it to be true.

This a factual matter that can easily be established by NWBO if true.

Your assertion that a court would have to be crooked to ask for proof of the rather hard to believe assertions of stock sales being based on future closing prices is "telling".
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News