Starstx-- I'm interested in your take on what sounds like your opinion of me being booted for valid reasons from the closed-minded and biased DD room. It's not impacting my life and I'm not vindictive or sour over it....really just curious because I do think you were one of the most level-headed members of the group.
You and I had a productive phone conversation once (imo), as I'm sure you remember. I know you didn't agree with my strategy of receiving info from OTCM that others didn't accomplish, and that's okay.
That room contained shallow people (not referring to you) who called me a liar for quoting actual/verifiable OTCM representatives...who were erroneously alleged of not even working there. That was the easiest information to validate...don't be lazy and call the number I provided and ask for them.
But because my findings contradicted the overall group hopium at the time, others became baselessly defensive and began attacking facts I shared that were 100% truthful and some of which were easily verifiable.
I've always thought your DD on the investigation was extremely detail-oriented and extended sincere appreciation for your efforts.
My only objective was to share information in the group to others who'd been screwed like myself. I live in the US and am prevented from purchasing more shares, so spreading lies to pick up more shares wouldn't have been an option, not that I wanted anymore shares by this point anyhow.
I reached the conclusion MF is a fraud in this scam (imo), through more boots-on-the ground DD than most here can truthfully attest to.
I reached the point after trying to help others discern truth and being attacked, that I lost the desire to help others and I had (and still have) so much more I never publicly released and never will at this point.
It blows my mind that there's a common belief when someone releases positive or negatively information, they're automatically compartmentalized as a pumper or basher with a self-awarding agenda.
I understand folks with integrity are hard to come by at times but we do still exist.
I wonder how many of the die-hard MF defenders still exist. CB made some excellent points that would have initiated spear chunking attacks by some in the DD room who were married to their beliefs.
Ever wonder why the attorney letters regarding CE, primarily only speak to SS and share ownership, and not more substantive to defending its underlying imposition? This should be common sense.
MF never made tenacious attempts to have the CE removed, other than providing info on % ownership because those details cannot be used to implicate crime(s).
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
