News Focus
News Focus
Followers 40
Posts 12240
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/01/2013

Re: reaper247 post# 6862

Wednesday, 08/17/2022 3:57:21 PM

Wednesday, August 17, 2022 3:57:21 PM

Post# of 8582
So saying that Sharp no longer is pursuing his court case was false and proven so by court docket entries.

So Sharp not objecting to Blankenship's motion to dismiss was false and proven so by a court docket entry.

So saying that Blankenship currently has a lawyer to defend him in Sharp's custodianship case against EVLI was false and proven so by a court docket entry.

Court documents don't lie (as opposed to all the false drivel that is usually posted here and in the intro). Sharp continues his custodianship court case - it is active and open. Sharp did object to Blankenship's motion to dismiss (which was upheld by the judge last week) and Blankenship currently is broke and without a lawyer representing him in court.

There is a lot of false information being spread here and in the intro.

Sharp is in a position of strength against Blankenship who is broke (he admitted so in court and Sharp tweeted about it) and is without a lawyer. Two of his lawyers left back to back in about a month for non-payment. The judge has already warned Blankenship about not having a lawyer when he showed up to a hearing without a lawyer a few months ago.

This may take some time but I'm convinced Sharp will regain control of EVLI once and for all.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent EVLI News