| Followers | 54 |
| Posts | 17525 |
| Boards Moderated | 3 |
| Alias Born | 01/11/2004 |
Sunday, December 26, 2021 4:57:10 PM
That’s just not factual at all and it’s well documented!
From the "Super 10K":
"ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
1. The Company is involved in a litigation, Asher Enterprises, Inc. v. Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc. and Linda Perry, Index No. 600717/2014, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, sitting in the County of Nassau. The Plaintiff alleges $337,500 in damages based on breach of contract allegations arising from the Company’s untimely periodic filings in December 2013. On September 18, 2014, the Court declined to grant the plaintiff’s application for default judgment and Linda Perry was removed as a defendant. The Court awarded judgment in favor of the Plaintiff on July 15, 2015 in the amount of $122,801.87, which does not include $25,000 paid in settlement efforts. On February 22, 2016 a Settlement Agreement was signed by the parties for a total of $85,000 to Asher Enterprises. Thereafter, the litigation continues."
Sooooo....
The "fake" PR is completely CORRECT! The JUDGEMENT was for $122K! To be paid to ASHER! Apparently, Linda had already paid $25K to try to settle, but it wasn't enough, so Asher took it and sued anyways! Linda and Asher then apparently came to an agreement to settle for an ADDITIONAL $85K, for a total settlement of $110K!
Where you are getting this $65K figure is anyone's guess. Probably just a figure snatched out of the air! If it ISN'T, post a link to VERIFIABLE INFO - proving the $65K is correct!
Come on. Don’t DBMM’s actual filings tell the TRUTH (the numbers anyways!)??
Hahahaha!
From the "Super 10K":
"ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
1. The Company is involved in a litigation, Asher Enterprises, Inc. v. Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc. and Linda Perry, Index No. 600717/2014, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, sitting in the County of Nassau. The Plaintiff alleges $337,500 in damages based on breach of contract allegations arising from the Company’s untimely periodic filings in December 2013. On September 18, 2014, the Court declined to grant the plaintiff’s application for default judgment and Linda Perry was removed as a defendant. The Court awarded judgment in favor of the Plaintiff on July 15, 2015 in the amount of $122,801.87, which does not include $25,000 paid in settlement efforts. On February 22, 2016 a Settlement Agreement was signed by the parties for a total of $85,000 to Asher Enterprises. Thereafter, the litigation continues."
Sooooo....
The "fake" PR is completely CORRECT! The JUDGEMENT was for $122K! To be paid to ASHER! Apparently, Linda had already paid $25K to try to settle, but it wasn't enough, so Asher took it and sued anyways! Linda and Asher then apparently came to an agreement to settle for an ADDITIONAL $85K, for a total settlement of $110K!
Where you are getting this $65K figure is anyone's guess. Probably just a figure snatched out of the air! If it ISN'T, post a link to VERIFIABLE INFO - proving the $65K is correct!
Come on. Don’t DBMM’s actual filings tell the TRUTH (the numbers anyways!)??
Hahahaha!
I keep telling myself....deep breath....count to ten....try to answer without personal attack...if available, always try to present fact to back up your opinion.
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
