Followers | 63 |
Posts | 3189 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 02/21/2014 |
Monday, November 01, 2021 12:44:10 PM
We certainly can understand your pain, but it would be a breach of fiduciary duty if CRXM management were to offer select shareholders some sort of bonus of additional shares, while not doing so for the rest of the same class of equity holders.
All shareholders need to be treated the same way, without favor or discrimination, irrespective of how long they have held their shares.
To do otherwise, is contrary to the just and equitable treatment of the entire class of common stakeholders, as the owners of the company.
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." ~ Arthur Schopenhauer
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies Launches New Compact Breath Logix Workplace Series and Prepares for Delivery to South Africa • May 7, 2024 8:51 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM