News Focus
News Focus
Followers 90
Posts 2993
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/18/2010

Re: Lowhndcpr post# 51160

Monday, 08/16/2021 10:26:27 PM

Monday, August 16, 2021 10:26:27 PM

Post# of 55522
No, I didn't misconstrue your post at all.

SSM could not get custodianship over a private company. And if SSM purchased shares on the open market...then a settlement for those shares was very probable in a private transaction.

SSM made that public statement about CRGP because it was in agreement. There was a stipulation, remember???

"The previous management will move forward with CRGP"

because the shares (share structure) existing in the market needs to be addressed. CRGP is 1000% stronger in their defense to go private without any other setbacks/hijacking attempts. Just thinking outside the box here and sharing what makes legal and logical sense.

Liability and Property

$13
$CRGP

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y