Tuesday, July 13, 2021 10:43:22 PM
Let me try to explain my position another way.
Doing a clinical trial of a representative population, placebo-controlled and double-blinded, is simply taking a sample of the actual answer in as neutral a form as possible. You pick your subjects to faithfully represent the population intended as the medical target; you use a placebo to isolate the medical effect from any baseline biases (such as deterioration over time) and the effects of hope in the subjects; you double-blind to avoid contaminating the results, especially when there are subjective standards, to prevent human biases from influencing the outcome.
In other words, you do everything possible to take a fair sample of the whole truth. Then you let statistics take over to inform you as to how sure you can be that your sample comes close enough to the whole truth. The scientific community is not willing to accept more than a five percent chance that you may be wrong. The results will be the results, and you can rely upon them to be right at least 95% of the time, or you don't pass the trial.
If you peek, you get a smaller sample size. That makes it harder to get your 95% confidence level, since your underlying performance has to be that much better. Keep in mind that you may have a proper therapeutic, but you will have more uncertainty -- more Heisenberg -- interfering with your results. Maybe enough to invalidate your trial, randomly, even though holding off would have given you the stats to pass. There are other issues that arise, but I am not the one to explain them. Your best odds of winning a trial with a good drug is to let it play out.
A couple of other points: As time goes on and we get closer to the final readout date, the n increases and the uncertainties in an interim look decrease relative to a final readout. The later the interim look, the less problems it can create. Second, I would understand if Missling asked for a look in the context of a hostile takeover. At that point, the equities being balanced can tip in favor of the earlier readout. But absent that circumstance, I have every confidence Anavex will see the 2b/3 trial through in the form that most assures its success.
Doing a clinical trial of a representative population, placebo-controlled and double-blinded, is simply taking a sample of the actual answer in as neutral a form as possible. You pick your subjects to faithfully represent the population intended as the medical target; you use a placebo to isolate the medical effect from any baseline biases (such as deterioration over time) and the effects of hope in the subjects; you double-blind to avoid contaminating the results, especially when there are subjective standards, to prevent human biases from influencing the outcome.
In other words, you do everything possible to take a fair sample of the whole truth. Then you let statistics take over to inform you as to how sure you can be that your sample comes close enough to the whole truth. The scientific community is not willing to accept more than a five percent chance that you may be wrong. The results will be the results, and you can rely upon them to be right at least 95% of the time, or you don't pass the trial.
If you peek, you get a smaller sample size. That makes it harder to get your 95% confidence level, since your underlying performance has to be that much better. Keep in mind that you may have a proper therapeutic, but you will have more uncertainty -- more Heisenberg -- interfering with your results. Maybe enough to invalidate your trial, randomly, even though holding off would have given you the stats to pass. There are other issues that arise, but I am not the one to explain them. Your best odds of winning a trial with a good drug is to let it play out.
A couple of other points: As time goes on and we get closer to the final readout date, the n increases and the uncertainties in an interim look decrease relative to a final readout. The later the interim look, the less problems it can create. Second, I would understand if Missling asked for a look in the context of a hostile takeover. At that point, the equities being balanced can tip in favor of the earlier readout. But absent that circumstance, I have every confidence Anavex will see the 2b/3 trial through in the form that most assures its success.
Recent AVXL News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/15/2026 08:15:25 PM
- Form 3 - Initial statement of beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/14/2026 08:15:30 PM
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/11/2026 08:30:22 PM
- CEO Transition and Delayed SEC Filing Put Anavex (AVXL) Leadership Changes in Focus • IH Market News • 05/06/2026 02:52:36 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/06/2026 11:04:59 AM
- Anavex Life Sciences Board of Directors Appoints Former Senior Vice President of Clinical Development Terrie Kellmeyer, PhD, as Interim Chief Executive Officer • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/06/2026 11:00:00 AM
- Form 3 - Initial statement of beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/01/2026 11:18:47 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences Highlights New Scientific Findings on Shared Biology Between Autism and Alzheimer’s Disease • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/14/2026 11:30:00 AM
- Anavex Life Sciences to Present at the 25th Annual Needham Virtual Healthcare Conference • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/07/2026 11:30:00 AM
- Anavex withdraws EU approval filing for Alzheimer’s therapy • IH Market News • 03/30/2026 12:39:26 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences Provides Comprehensive Regulatory Update • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/30/2026 11:30:00 AM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/25/2026 08:06:00 PM
- Anavex withdraws EU marketing application for Alzheimer’s therapy blarcamesine • IH Market News • 03/25/2026 02:06:58 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences Provides Update on Regulatory Review in the EU for Blarcamesine to Treat Early Alzheimer’s Disease • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/25/2026 11:30:00 AM
- Anavex Life Sciences Presents New Data from its AD-004 Phase IIb/III Trial at AD/PD 2026 Conference Demonstrating Consistent Correlation Between the Treatment Effect of Oral Blarcamesine and Preservation of Brain Volume in Early Alzheimer’s Disease • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/23/2026 11:30:00 AM
- New Scientific Findings Highlight Hypothesis of Autophagy Failure as a Precursor of Amyloid Beta and Tau Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/20/2026 11:30:00 AM
- Anavex Life Sciences Presents Significant Treatment Effects of Blarcamesine in New Advanced Alpha-Synuclein Model of Parkinson’s Disease at AD/PD 2026 Conference • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/17/2026 11:30:00 AM
- Anavex Life Sciences to Present at the Citizens Life Sciences Conference • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/03/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences to Present at the 46th TD Cowen Annual Health Care Conference • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/25/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/25/2026 11:07:01 AM
- Anavex Life Sciences Appoints Seasoned Healthcare Leader to Board of Directors • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/23/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/09/2026 09:40:27 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/09/2026 12:31:17 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences Reports Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Financial Results and Provides Business Update • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/09/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences to Announce Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Financial Results on Monday, February 9, 2026 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/03/2026 12:30:00 PM
