Friday, June 25, 2021 2:21:38 PM
is this supposed to be an apa case or a takings case. aka can the government legally take (takings), or is what the government did illegal (apa).
the supreme court rules that the government did not break the law and did what it could do legally.. so then it just becomes a takings case.
there are still contract claims in lamberth that are unaffected here as well.
these cases continue to move forward and the takings case gets stronger.
This isn't over. And, in fact, SCOTUS helped our two cases in USCFC by declaring the conservator is a government actor and FHFA can't sue itself.
— Bryndon Fisher (@bryndonfisher) June 25, 2021
North Bay Resources Commences Operations at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California; Engages Sabean Group Management Consulting • NBRI • Sep 25, 2024 9:15 AM
CEO David B. Dorwart Anticipates a Bright Future at Good Gaming Inc. Through His Most Recent Shareholder Update • GMER • Sep 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Advance Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology - Dr. Bruce Goldberger to Present at Society of Forensic Toxicologists Conference • BLOZF • Sep 24, 2024 8:50 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Announces Strategic Partnership For GLP-1 (Semaglutide) Procurement Through MedWell USA, LLC. • INTV • Sep 24, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Accelerates Creation of AI-Powered Platform to Revolutionize Patient Care • AVAI • Sep 24, 2024 8:00 AM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM