Friday, June 25, 2021 2:21:38 PM
is this supposed to be an apa case or a takings case. aka can the government legally take (takings), or is what the government did illegal (apa).
the supreme court rules that the government did not break the law and did what it could do legally.. so then it just becomes a takings case.
there are still contract claims in lamberth that are unaffected here as well.
these cases continue to move forward and the takings case gets stronger.
This isn't over. And, in fact, SCOTUS helped our two cases in USCFC by declaring the conservator is a government actor and FHFA can't sue itself.
— Bryndon Fisher (@bryndonfisher) June 25, 2021
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM