Friday, June 25, 2021 2:21:38 PM
the prevailing initial question to the courts to decide upon was:
is this supposed to be an apa case or a takings case. aka can the government legally take (takings), or is what the government did illegal (apa).
the supreme court rules that the government did not break the law and did what it could do legally.. so then it just becomes a takings case.
there are still contract claims in lamberth that are unaffected here as well.
these cases continue to move forward and the takings case gets stronger.
is this supposed to be an apa case or a takings case. aka can the government legally take (takings), or is what the government did illegal (apa).
the supreme court rules that the government did not break the law and did what it could do legally.. so then it just becomes a takings case.
there are still contract claims in lamberth that are unaffected here as well.
these cases continue to move forward and the takings case gets stronger.
This isn't over. And, in fact, SCOTUS helped our two cases in USCFC by declaring the conservator is a government actor and FHFA can't sue itself.
— Bryndon Fisher (@bryndonfisher) June 25, 2021
Recent FNMA News
- Fannie Mae Announces Credit Score Model Updates to Advance Credit Score Modernization • PR Newswire (US) • 04/22/2026 05:02:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases February 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 03/26/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Results of Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 03/02/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases January 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 02/26/2026 09:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 02/23/2026 02:00:00 PM

