DD Support Board and Research Team

[DragonBear]

apparently a well respected quack Vacine advocate has concerns.

This so called expert believes vaccines such as the mRNAs will place selective pressure on the Covid virus to mutate. Whereas no vaccines will mean the virus is under no selective pressure to mutate in the unvaccinated which subsequently become infected.

Which is all ass backwards.

A person vaccinated with mRNAs upon being "infected" with Covid will likely (hopefully) have an immune response, wiping out the infectious dose, or at least take the viral load down to low levels. Whether those vaccinated could become asymptomatic carriers is still unknown.

Whereas an unvaccinated person infected with Covid could eventually have titers of 10**9/ml of virus particles at the peak of infection.

Which of the two above hosts does the Covid virus with a 0.02% mutation rate have the best chance of undergoing significant mutation in? A potential vaccinated carrier with 10**1 viral particles per ml or an unvaccinated now infected individual with 10**9/ml. It's a numbers game. The more virus replication, the more mutations can take place.

Variants can't arise in vaccinated individuals. There's no selective pressure and time required for the virus to mutate. With the immune system taking it out. However, in the infected with high titers, selective pressure is in play.

Then there's the curious case of Benjamin Buttons... I mean...

Boston immunocompromised Covid patient

Where the poor guy was a super mutation vat for Covid. Those immunocompromised should get high priority on the vaccine, but they are not.

The bottom line is those unvaccinated, subsequently infected, are walking incubation vats. Able despite a low Covid mutation rate, to eventually spawn variants. The danger being the variants when transmitted to the vaccinated might have already learned how to escape the immune system the vaccine setup. Geerts proclaiming the opposite is ridiculous.