Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[jessellivermore]

raf and TTE...

There is no bedrock legal thinking that supports. the rights of the government to supersede the property rights of ownership.Unless there is a clear and an eminent danger. Or a right of domain. And if it is eminent domain then the government must pay market value for seizing the property. the USA economics is based on free enterprise..Which means the property owner can charge what ever price will bear..But that might not stop SJWs from dipping their pens into the ink...

There always has to be some skepticism revolving around decisions that give away the property rights of someone else..Why should Amarin not start a campaign against the exorbitant high salaries of Federal Judges..or senators or other politicians..If the government wants to relieve the burden of the elderly or the impoverished..Then it (government) should increase taxes and subsidize the health care of the elderly and the poor..But don't steal the property of its citizens

Giving away the property of the innovators like Amarin, which ICER shows actually cuts the over all costs of medicine is not the correct solution.In fact it is exactly the wrong solution...Because if these do good judges gift Vascepa to the generics...This is going to greatly lower the chances of seeing new Vascepa's in the future..
Does anyone on this board think Amarin would have continued to spend their and the shareholders money..Money that shareholders could have better spent...If they thought the federal courts could just move in and hand their property to someone else who did no work or invested (risked) no money...This is nothing less than theft by the legal system..

Last time I looked we were not a communist country...

":>) JL