Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[rafunrafun]

Important post, IMO.

TTE wrote (which I fully agree with) :

If we get judges who care mostly about cheap drugs for the masses, it's over. Fairness won't matter

Conversely, if our judges rule strictly on law (without societal / political / ideological / social-justice-warrior (SJW) like biases), IMO our chances of winning are well above 90%.

But that's a big IF. How do we (Amarin) remove some of those preconceived biases? The answer lies within TTE's important message:

If we get judges who care mostly about cheap drugs for the masses, it's over. Fairness won't matter

Cheap drugs for the masses - how can we (Amarin) persuade a SJW judge that generics (SPECIFICALLY in Amarin's case, not in general) will not be much cheaper (if cheaper at all) and certainly will not get to the masses?

Jonathan Singer can't really say that, but who/what can?

Amicus Briefs!

There 100% must be one filed by a reputable source debunking the cheap/masses narrative and citing the ICER report!

Major problem would be addressed.