Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,967.38
(
1.18%
)
US TECH 100
25,133.20
(
1.77%
)
Dow Jones
48,535.99
(
0.66%
)
Brent Oil
92.69
(
-2.91%
)
Bitcoin
74,290.00
(
-0.28%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 447315
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

HDGabor

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 142
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

HDGabor

Re: jomama9231 post# 262403

Sunday, 04/05/2020 12:47:30 PM

Sunday, April 05, 2020 12:47:30 PM

Post# of 447315
j-

Legal hypothesis is less rigid than scientific. e,g.:

For example, to find a patent invalid, a factfinder would have to point to a suggestion in the prior art, perhaps in a published trade article, that component A of an invention might be improved by combining it with component B. If the challenged patent is composed of A and B, then the suggestion in the prior art could be cited to justify finding the patent obvious and invalid.

Best,
G

"There are some things money can't buy. … For these, there is AMRN."

Disclosure: I am long with this stock. I wrote this post myself, and it expresses my own opinions (IMHO). I am not receiving compensation for

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent AMRN News
More AMRN News