InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 162
Posts 12645
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 12/29/2010

Re: SittingPretty post# 137805

Thursday, 07/05/2018 4:25:44 PM

Thursday, July 05, 2018 4:25:44 PM

Post# of 222245
Yeah, I get people’s concern with these custodial takeovers, but IMO I don’t see that big of an issue with it unless they are backdating debt or gaining control of these illegally. If they are going through the trouble of hiring a lawyer and filing for custodianship, then I don’t see why anyone would have an issue with them issuing themselves shares as a way of payment. This is especially true if they are really gaining control and selling the shell to another company for a reverse merger.

There are a lot of shareholders that got screwed because old managment just walked away from these stocks. I for one am happy when someone comes along and takes control. At least Alessi has had a few successful reverse mergers with the shells he has taken over.

The only issue I would have is if these custodians were dumping shares while they are going through the court and getting the company current. If they sell the shell, then IMO they have a right to sell the shares they awarded themselves however they like.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.